← All bills

SB 899 · 2019-20

Allows housing on college and religious land

Official subject Planning and zoning: housing development: higher education institutions and religious institutions.

Didn't pass Passed Senate, stopped in Assembly · Did not advance before a deadline

Plain-language summary

Affordable housing on land owned by independent colleges or religious institutions, with a qualified developer, must be approved by right, without CEQA review. All units must be affordable to lower income households, though 20% may be moderate-income. Projects may get density bonuses. Parking is capped at one space per unit, with none required near major transit and car share.

How these summaries are written

Subject changed

This bill was introduced with a different subject: “Density bonuses.” It was later rewritten to cover the subject above.

Official summary · Legislative Counsel's Digest

Describes the final version (Amended Assembly, Aug. 3, 2020).

Read the official summary (9 paragraphs)

The Planning and Zoning Law requires each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for its physical development, and the development of certain lands outside its boundaries, that includes, among other mandatory elements, a housing element. That law allows a development proponent to submit an application for a development that is subject to a specified streamlined, ministerial approval process not subject to a conditional use permit if the development satisfies certain objective planning standards.

This bill would require that a housing development project be a use by right upon the request of an independent institution of higher education or religious institution that partners with a qualified developer on any land owned in fee simple by the applicant on or before January 1, 2020, if the development satisfies specified criteria. The bill would define various terms for these purposes. Among other things, the bill would require that 100% of the units, exclusive of manager units, in a housing development project eligible for approval as a use by right under these provisions be affordable to lower income households, except that 20% of the units may be for moderate-income households, provided that all the units are provided at affordable rent or affordable housing cost, as specified. The bill would authorize the development to include ancillary uses on the ground floor of the development, as specified.

This bill would specify that a housing development project that is eligible for approval as a use by right under the bill is also eligible for a density bonus or other incentives or concessions, except as specified. The bill would require a development subject to these provisions to provide off-street parking of up to one space per unit, unless a local ordinance provides for a lower standard of parking, in which case the ordinance applies. The bill would prohibit a local government from imposing any parking requirement on a development subject to these provisions if the development is located within one-half mile walking distance of a high-quality transit corridor or major transit stop, as those terms are defined, and within one block of a car share vehicle.

The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA does not apply to the ministerial approval of projects.

This bill, by requiring approval of certain development projects as a use by right, would expand the exemption for ministerial approval of projects under CEQA.

By adding to the duties of local planning officials with respect to approving certain development projects, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Official title

An act to add Section 65913.5 to the Government Code, relating to housing.

Timeline

  1. Jan. 30, 2020 Introduced
  2. June 25, 2020 Passed Senate 39 yes, 0 no
  3. Aug. 18, 2020 Stopped in the Assembly Did not advance before a deadline
Full official history (23 actions)
  1. Jan. 30, 2020 Introduced: Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
  2. Jan. 31, 2020 From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 1.
  3. Feb. 12, 2020 Referred to Com. on RLS.
  4. March 5, 2020 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
  5. March 16, 2020 Re-referred to Coms. on HOUSING, EQ., and GOV. & F.
  6. May 12, 2020 Referral to Coms. on EQ., and GOV. & F. rescinded due to the shortened 2020 Legislative Calendar.
  7. May 18, 2020 Set for hearing May 26.
  8. May 26, 2020 From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3595.) (May 26).
  9. May 27, 2020 Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
  10. June 3, 2020 Set for hearing June 9.
  11. June 9, 2020 June 9 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
  12. June 11, 2020 Set for hearing June 18.
  13. June 18, 2020 From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3766.) (June 18).
  14. June 18, 2020 Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
  15. June 22, 2020 Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  16. June 25, 2020 Passed Senate: Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 3862.) Ordered to the Assembly.
  17. June 25, 2020 In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
  18. June 29, 2020 Referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
  19. July 27, 2020 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
  20. July 28, 2020 July 28 hearing postponed by committee.
  21. July 30, 2020 From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 29).
  22. Aug. 3, 2020 Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
  23. Aug. 18, 2020 August 18 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.